TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13120847
Played Sep 13Finished
Robert Szymik
Home
1.68
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 2
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
511119115911116
Andrzej Szurgot
Away
2.07
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
1–9Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:50 and never touched — 61.2% is still 61.2%
Graded at full timeRobert Szymik to win
61.2%
61.2%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
89 points played in total.
Set by set
511119115911116
H2H Robert Szymik 5–0 Andrzej Szurgot Andrzej Szurgot has won 0 of their 5 meetings.
Same-day rematch · 6h before this match
Szymik beat Szurgot 3-0.
Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically — the market typically prices this in. Which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 15:50What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.68 (55%)
Szymik
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
5-0 in 5
Szymik
Correct
gap of 5 in 5, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Szymik 1372 vs Szurgot 1080
Szymik
Correct
both rated, 292 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Szymik 40% vs Szurgot 20%
Szymik
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Szymik 50% vs Szurgot 10%
Szymik
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Szymik -2 · Szurgot -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 60% — Slight lean (leans Szymik) · live re-read · sealed at 61% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Szurgot form (20%) is below what odds imply (48%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsSzymik 1.68 / Szurgot 2.07
Signal prob.60% / 40%
Edge (Szymik)+4.4pp
TT Elite Series · #13120847
Szymik1.68
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite70% won 283 of 404
Up 2–0, closes it96% 165 of 172
Up 1–0, closes it84% 216 of 258
Szurgot2.07
10%won 1 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
10%takes the first set · 1 of 10
As underdog15% won 10 of 67
Down 0–1, comes back12% 6 of 51
Down 0–2, comes back5% 2 of 37
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 5 meetings
HomeSzymik5wins
AwaySzurgot0wins
Szymik leads 5–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeSzymik100%4 of 4
AwaySzurgotn = 1, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 5 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Szymik4Szurgot1n = 5Szymik took 4 of 5
S2Szymik5Szurgot0n = 5Szymik took 5 of 5
S3Szymik5Szurgot0n = 5Szymik took 5 of 5
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 5 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 5 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home480%
3–1Four sets, home120%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 5 meetings
MetricSzymikSzurgotSzymik − SzurgotBasisWins50+5in 5 meetingsFirst set41+3of 5Avg pointsper match34.220.2+14.0per matchSweeps40+43–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricSzymikSzurgotBasisWin rate · lifetime614 / 945 vs 16 / 8865%18.2%614 / 945 vs 16 / 88Avg sets wonper match2.31.0per matchAvg pointsper match37.830.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
SzymikSzymik 1.68/Szurgot 2.07
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
59.6%
Szymik · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Szymik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record5
WSep 12 · 21:05R. Szymik331111113A. Szurgot143380
WSep 12 · 01:55R. Szymik3851111113A. Szurgot33116791
WSep 11 · 19:55R. Szymik341211113A. Szurgot1610420
WSep 6 · 03:05R. Szymik331111113A. Szurgot218580
WSep 5 · 21:05R. Szymik331111113A. Szurgot177460
R. Szymik10
LSep 13 · 01:55R. Szymik1.558118131G. Sawicki2.3011911153LSep 13 · 24:45O. Sokolowski2.2711911113R. Szymik1.52611751WSep 12 · 23:55R. Szymik1.6591111113K. Schaniel2.02116981LSep 12 · 22:20R. Szymik3.251149101P. Gasiorski1.2791111123WSep 12 · 21:05R. Szymik1.121111113A. Szurgot4.753380WSep 12 · 19:55R. Szymik1.321211113G. Sawicki2.9510960LSep 12 · 18:45R. Wiza2.8081111113R. Szymik1.36115881WSep 12 · 17:55R. Szymik1.82111116113K. Schaniel1.8811961192LSep 12 · 04:20R. Szymik1.3614712772R. Wiza2.7512111011113WSep 12 · 03:05R. Szymik1.211111113J. Michalski3.706670
A. Szurgot10
LSep 13 · 02:20O. Sokolowski1.2511811123A. Szurgot3.455117101WSep 13 · 01:30A. Szurgot4.2061114113K. Schaniel1.161161251LSep 13 · 24:20A. Szurgot3.005890R. Wiza1.301111113LSep 12 · 22:40A. Szurgot2.5581251162G. Sawicki1.451110118113LSep 12 · 21:05R. Szymik1.121111113A. Szurgot4.753380LSep 12 · 20:20R. Wiza1.331113113A. Szurgot2.9071170LSep 12 · 19:30A. Szurgot4.20811441K. Schaniel1.1611611113LSep 12 · 18:20A. Szurgot8.00613941P. Gasiorski1.03111111113LSep 12 · 04:40J. Michalski1.601211113A. Szurgot2.1110580LSep 12 · 03:55J. Orszulik1.2481111113A. Szurgot3.40115151
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.