TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13082614
Played Sep 5Finished
Marcin Lach
Home
1.39
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
118115118––––
Roman Piechnik
Away
2.70
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:51 and never touched — 57.1% is still 57.1%
Graded at full timeRoman Piechnik to win
57.1%
57.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
54 points played in total.
Set by set
118115118––––
H2H Marcin Lach 0–1 Roman Piechnik Marcin Lach has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 12:51What took a side1 for · 2 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.39 (66%)
Lach
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-1 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Lach 1411 vs Piechnik 1305
Lach
Correct
both rated, 106 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Lach 40% vs Piechnik 80%
Piechnik
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Lach 60% vs Piechnik 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Lach -1 · Piechnik -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 69% — Clear lean (leans Lach) · live re-read · sealed at 43% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Piechnik form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (37%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsLach 1.39 / Piechnik 2.70
Signal prob.69% / 31%
Edge (Lach)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13082614
Lach1.39
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite65% won 104 of 159
Up 2–0, closes it98% 61 of 62
Up 1–0, closes it80% 75 of 94
Piechnik2.70
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog30% won 6 of 20
Down 0–1, comes back14% 2 of 14
Down 0–2, comes back9% 1 of 11
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeLach0wins
AwayPiechnik1wins
1 of 1 to a deciderPiechnik leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away1
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away0
This 1 meeting
MetricLachPiechnikL − PBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set01−1of 1Avg pointsper match53.056.0−3.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricLachPiechnikBasisWin rate · lifetime129 / 204 vs 16 / 3763.2%43.2%129 / 204 vs 16 / 37Avg sets wonper match2.41.6per matchAvg pointsper match38.935.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
LachLach 1.39/Piechnik 2.70
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
68.8%
Lach · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Lach won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
LSep 5 · 09:30M. Lach—8141011102R. Piechnik—1112129123
M. Lach10
LSep 6 · 16:20M. Lach1.6071040R. Piechnik2.151112113WSep 6 · 15:05M. Lach1.65131112113R. Wojcik2.101161471WSep 6 · 13:55M. Lach1.6911511113W. Wojtaszczyk2.01411491WSep 6 · 12:45K. Slawinski1.75781181M. Lach1.9511118113LSep 6 · 11:55M. Lach1.86911991M. Oracz1.8011711113LSep 6 · 10:20M. Lach1.95811971K. Slawinski1.7011811113WSep 6 · 09:05M. Lach1.6311139113R. Wojcik2.108111111WSep 6 · 07:55M. Lach1.7111712123W. Wojtaszczyk2.0061110101WSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113LSep 6 · 05:55M. Lach—1012841M. Oracz—121011113
R. Piechnik10
WSep 6 · 16:20M. Lach1.6071040R. Piechnik2.151112113LSep 6 · 15:30K. Slawinski1.70911911113R. Piechnik2.0011211392WSep 6 · 14:45R. Piechnik1.501114113M. Oracz2.5091270LSep 6 · 13:10R. Piechnik2.258611101W. Wojtaszczyk1.5711115123WSep 6 · 12:20R. Wojcik1.68121111492R. Piechnik2.02149911113LSep 6 · 11:05R. Piechnik2.507116111M. Oracz1.4511911133LSep 6 · 09:30R. Piechnik2.6011811492K. Slawinski1.41511911113LSep 6 · 08:20R. Piechnik1.95714551R. Wojcik1.75111211113LSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113WSep 6 · 05:30R. Piechnik—1112133W. Wojtaszczyk—410110
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.