Mauro Scharrer vs Daniel Lindso 3-2

TT Lossbeater/Challenger Series TT

Challenger Series TT

Played Sep 24Finished

Mauro Scharrer

Home

2.25

At publish

Won last 5

Form at publish

6–4Last 10Won last 5

Final

3 – 2

Set by set

11912108115111210

Daniel Lindso

Away

1.54

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

6–4Last 10Won last 1

The read, and what happenedsealed at 07:14 and never touched — 67.7% is still 67.7%

Graded at full time

Mauro Scharrer to win

67.7%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is goingMauro Scharrer above · Daniel Lindso below

Set 1 · 11-9

Set 2 · 12-10

Set 3 · 8-11

Set 4 · 5-11

Set 5 · 12-10

Point 99 set 5, 12-10 — our read held Mauro Scharrer at 67.7%

99 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 07:14

What took a side2 for · 1 against · 2 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.54 (59%)

Lindso

Wrong

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Form (L5)

Scharrer 100% vs Lindso 40%

Scharrer

Correct

60pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Scharrer 60% vs Lindso 60%

—

Too close

0pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Streak

Scharrer +5 · Lindso +1

Scharrer

Correct

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

2 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 59% — Slight lean (leans Lindso) · live re-read · sealed at 32% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Lindso form (40%) is below what odds imply (65%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsScharrer 2.25 / Lindso 1.54

Signal prob.41% / 59%

Edge (Lindso)+0.0pp

Challenger Series TT · #13187946

Scharrer2.25

60%won 6 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

Won last 5

oldest → newest

30%takes the first set · 3 of 10

As underdog15% won 2 of 13

Down 0–1, comes back0% 0 of 7

Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 6

Lindso1.54

60%won 6 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

oldest → newest

70%takes the first set · 7 of 10

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricScharrerLindsoBasisWin rate · lifetime32 / 61 vs 6 / 1052.5%60%32 / 61 vs 6 / 10Avg sets wonper match2.02.3per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

Forecastthe model predicts this market

Match Winner

Lindso

Scharrer 2.25/Lindso 1.54

Read onlywould have missed

What we said

59.4%

Lindso · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–2

Scharrer won

Handicap · Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

M. Scharrer10