Form at publish
3 – 1
Set by set
Form at publish
Radek Zeman to win
65.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct, not a call that won.
Set 1 · 11-7
Set 2 · 11-3
Set 3 · 9-11
Set 4 · 11-5
Point 68 set 4, 11-5 · our read held Radek Zeman at 65.1%
68 points played in total.
H2H Radek Zeman 47–44 Marek Dlask Marek Dlask has won 44 of their 91 meetings.
65.1%Our read66.7%to break even at 1.50
short by 1.6pp66.7% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.50 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Same-day rematch · 4h before this match
Zeman beat Dlask 3-2.
Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically. The market typically prices this in, which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.
Today's board has its reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 21:56 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded