Form at publish
2 – 3
Set by set
Form at publish
Jiri Vanous to win
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
WrongSent to Pro: Peter Chvojka @ 2.10 · Won
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Set 1 · 5-11
Set 2 · 11-6
Set 3 · 5-11
Set 4 · 13-11
Set 5 · 8-11
Point 92 set 5, 8-11 · our read held Jiri Vanous at 54.0%
92 points played in total.
H2H Jiri Vanous 10–2 Peter Chvojka Peter Chvojka has won 2 of their 12 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Peter Chvojka @ 2.10 · Won
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Sent to Pro: Peter Chvojka @ 2.10 · Won
54.0%Our read60.0%to break even at 1.666
short by 6.0pp60.0% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.666 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 1 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
Today's board has its reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 18:16 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded