Form at publish
3 – 2
Set by set
Form at publish
Filip Sikora to win
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
RightSent to Pro: Filip Sikora @ 1.91 · Won
Set 1 · 14-12
Set 2 · 11-9
Set 3 · 10-12
Set 4 · 1-11
Set 5 · 13-11
Point 104 set 5, 13-11 · our read held Filip Sikora at 54.0%
104 points played in total.
H2H Filip Sikora 15–15 Petr Vicherek Dead even across their 30 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Filip Sikora @ 1.91 · Won
Sent to Pro: Filip Sikora @ 1.91 · Won
54.0%Our read54.6%to break even at 1.833
short by 0.6pp54.6% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.833 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 09:08 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded