Rotislav Hasmanda vs Lubos Mikyska 3-1

TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro

Czech Liga Pro

Played Oct 6Finished

Rotislav Hasmanda

Home

1.54

At publish

Won last 2

Form at publish

6–4Last 10Won last 2

Final

3 – 1

Set by set

101212101311116––

Lubos Mikyska

Away

2.25

At publish

Lost last 2

Form at publish

0–2Last 2Lost last 2

The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:23 and never touched: 59.4% is still 59.4%

Graded at full time

Rotislav Hasmanda to win

59.4%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct, not a call that won.

How it is goingRotislav Hasmanda above · Lubos Mikyska below

Set 1 · 10-12

Set 2 · 12-10

Set 3 · 13-11

Set 4 · 11-6

Point 85 set 4, 11-6 · our read held Rotislav Hasmanda at 59.4%

85 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 12:23

59.4%Our read64.9%to break even at 1.54

short by 5.5pp

64.9% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.54 they are the same number)

What took a side3 for · 0 against · 2 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.54 (59%)

Hasmanda

Correct

no bar to clear: a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Form (L5)

Hasmanda 40% vs Mikyska 0%

Hasmanda

Correct

40pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Hasmanda 60% vs Mikyska 0%

Hasmanda

Correct

60pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Hasmanda +2 · Mikyska -2

—

Too close

neither holds a run of 3 on their own

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

3 for, 2 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 59% · Slight lean (leans Hasmanda) · sealed before the serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Mikyska form (0%) is below what odds imply (44%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsHasmanda 1.54 / Mikyska 2.25

Signal prob.59% / 41%

Edge (Hasmanda)-5.5pp (anti-value)

Czech Liga Pro · #13253676

Hasmanda1.54

60%won 6 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

Won last 2

oldest → newest

60%takes the first set · 6 of 10

As favourite63% won 96 of 152

Up 2–0, closes it92% 57 of 62

Up 1–0, closes it79% 73 of 93

Mikyska2.25

0%won 0 of 2 · last 10

Last match: today

Lost last 2

oldest → newest

0%takes the first set · 0 of 2

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands: it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricHasmandaMikyskaBasisWin rate · lifetime375 / 762 vs 0 / 249.2%0%375 / 762 vs 0 / 2Avg sets wonper match2.01.5per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

Forecastthe model predicts this market

Match Winner

Hasmanda

Hasmanda 1.54/Mikyska 2.25

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

59.4%

Hasmanda · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–1

Hasmanda won

Handicap · Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together: one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Event Chatroom

This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.

Rotislav Hasmanda vs Lubos Mikyska 3-1 · Czech Liga Pro

Decision Summary

Deep Dive by Market

Match Winner

Event Chatroom

Rotislav Hasmanda vs Lubos Mikyska 3-1 · Czech Liga Pro

Decision Summary

Deep Dive by Market

Match Winner

Event Chatroom

Today's matches are already sealed.