TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
Kacper Adamus vs Wojciech Pytlas 0-3 · TT Elite Series
TT Elite Series
Played Oct 1Finished
Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 4
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
10126111214––––
Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 17:59 and never touched: 65.3% is still 65.3%
Graded at full timeKacper Adamus to win
65.3%
65.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
65 points played in total.
Set by set
10126111214––––
H2H Kacper Adamus 28–6 Wojciech Pytlas Wojciech Pytlas has won 6 of their 34 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 17:5965.3%Our read62.5%to break even at 1.60
clears by 2.8pp62.5% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.60 they are the same number)
What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.60 (57%)
Adamus
Wrong
no bar to clear: a priced side always votes
H2H
28-6 in 34
Adamus
Wrong
gap of 22 in 34, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Adamus 1435 vs Pytlas 1341
Adamus
Wrong
both rated, 94 points apart, no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Adamus 80% vs Pytlas 80%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Adamus 70% vs Pytlas 60%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Adamus +4 · Pytlas -1
Adamus
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 65% · Clear lean (leans Adamus) · sealed before the serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Pytlas form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (48%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAdamus 1.60 / Pytlas 2.10
Signal prob.65% / 35%
Edge (Adamus)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13229251
Adamus1.60
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
Won last 4
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite61% won 355 of 579
Up 2–0, closes it97% 195 of 202
Up 1–0, closes it79% 287 of 363
Pytlas2.10
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog40% won 48 of 120
Down 0–1, comes back30% 24 of 80
Down 0–2, comes back14% 6 of 44
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeAdamus9wins
AwayPytlas1wins
4 of 10 to a deciderAdamus leads 9–1, and 4 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeAdamus88.9%8 of 9
AwayPytlasn = 1, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n: a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Adamus9Pytlas1n = 10Adamus took 9 of 10
S2Adamus5Pytlas5n = 10split evenly
S3Adamus6Pytlas4n = 10Adamus took 6 of 10
S4Adamus6Pytlas1n = 7Adamus took 6 of 7
S5Adamus3Pytlas1n = 4Adamus took 3 of 4
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10. A scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home330%
3–1Four sets, home330%
3–2Decider, home330%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricAdamusPytlasA − PBasisWins91+8in 10 meetingsFirst set91+8of 10Avg pointsper match42.936.1+6.8per matchSweeps30+33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAdamusPytlasBasisWin rate · lifetime920 / 1687 vs 397 / 75254.5%52.8%920 / 1687 vs 397 / 752Avg sets wonper match2.12.0per matchAvg pointsper match38.537.1per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did: no prediction
Match Winner
AdamusAdamus 1.60/Pytlas 2.10
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
65.3%
Adamus · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Pytlas won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 12 · 03:10K. Adamus561131111203W. Pytlas58711139182
WSep 5 · 08:45K. Adamus4511119143W. Pytlas378611121
WAug 29 · 04:25K. Adamus4213711113W. Pytlas341111481
LAug 27 · 20:45K. Adamus4811981192W. Pytlas47711117113
WAug 8 · 04:25K. Adamus471141110113W. Pytlas3751161232
WAug 1 · 04:50K. Adamus331111113W. Pytlas176560
WJul 30 · 16:25K. Adamus47711612113W. Pytlas50119111092
WJul 23 · 19:10K. Adamus341111123W. Pytlas2138100
WJul 9 · 15:10K. Adamus4411814113W. Pytlas388111271
WJul 4 · 06:25K. Adamus331111113W. Pytlas227690
K. Adamus10
WOct 1 · 16:25K. Adamus1.73111188113M. Koczyba2.0034111162WOct 1 · 15:10K. Adamus1.711111133K. Juszczyk2.0096110WSep 30 · 13:55K. Adamus1.131111113I. Szymanski5.505390WSep 30 · 12:40K. Adamus1.221411113K. Kowalski4.0012690LSep 30 · 11:25K. Adamus2.0081171182P. Brozek1.73119119113WSep 30 · 10:10P. Przewlocki1.83919111172K. Adamus1.83112189113WSep 30 · 09:25K. Adamus2.10119118163O. Jadach1.67811511142LSep 30 · 07:45K. Adamus1.837880P. Przewlocki1.831111113WSep 30 · 06:30K. Adamus1.221110811113K. Kowalski4.0081211522LSep 30 · 05:15K. Adamus2.20891171P. Brozek1.6111117113
W. Pytlas10
WOct 1 · 18:45M. Koczyba1.551185101W. Pytlas2.3051111123LOct 1 · 17:10W. Pytlas2.501151411M. Tkocz1.4841116113WOct 1 · 16:00W. Pytlas1.6611911113G. Jurowicz2.05811761WSep 30 · 20:45P. Kaczynski1.7299111122W. Pytlas2.02111185113WSep 30 · 19:35W. Pytlas1.86117116113K. Juszczyk1.8081151132WSep 30 · 18:25S. Krupa1.84111211482W. Pytlas1.871310311113WSep 30 · 17:10A. Ruszkiewicz1.951211641W. Pytlas1.7514611113WSep 30 · 15:35M. Koczyba1.65111111852W. Pytlas2.10813811113LSep 27 · 08:20W. Pytlas3.202680P. Zemla1.331111113LSep 27 · 06:45M. Adamus1.8511101311113W. Pytlas1.8561215482
Upcoming Matches
K. Adamus
W. Pytlas
Nothing scheduled
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.