Waclaw Suchecki vs Bartosz Czerwinski 1-3

TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series

TT Elite SeriesMatch #13141375

Played Sep 17Finished

Waclaw Suchecki

Home

4.05

At publish

Lost last 4

Form at publish

2–8Last 10Lost last 4

Final

1 – 3

Set by set

117911511811––

Bartosz Czerwinski

Away

1.18

At publish

Won last 2

Form at publish

6–4Last 10Won last 2

The read, and what happenedsealed at 16:40 and never touched — 81.2% is still 81.2%

Graded at full time

Bartosz Czerwinski to win

81.2%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is going

Point-by-point unavailable

BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.

73 points played in total.

Set by set

117911511811––

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 16:40

What took a side4 for · 1 against · 1 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.18 (77%)

Czerwinski

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Suchecki 1172 vs Czerwinski 1538

Czerwinski

Correct

both rated, 367 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Suchecki 20% vs Czerwinski 60%

Czerwinski

Correct

40pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Suchecki 20% vs Czerwinski 60%

Czerwinski

Correct

40pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Suchecki -4 · Czerwinski +2

Suchecki

Wrong

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

4 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 80% — Strong (leans Czerwinski) · live re-read · sealed at 81% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Czerwinski form (60%) is below what odds imply (85%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsSuchecki 4.05 / Czerwinski 1.18

Signal prob.20% / 80%

Edge (Czerwinski)+2.8pp

TT Elite Series · #13141375

Suchecki4.05

20%won 2 of 10 · last 10

Lost last 4

oldest → newest

40%takes the first set · 4 of 10

As underdog43% won 30 of 70

Down 0–1, comes back22% 9 of 41

Down 0–2, comes back4% 1 of 25

Czerwinski1.18

60%won 6 of 10 · last 10

Won last 2

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As favourite62% won 85 of 138

Up 2–0, closes it100% 34 of 34

Up 1–0, closes it83% 60 of 72

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricSucheckiCzerwinskiBasisWin rate · lifetime115 / 304 vs 496 / 105037.8%47.2%115 / 304 vs 496 / 1050Avg sets wonper match1.72.0per matchAvg pointsper match36.038.0per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

Forecastthe model predicts this market

Match Winner

Czerwinski

Suchecki 4.05/Czerwinski 1.18

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

80.2%

Czerwinski · sealed before the serve

What happened

1–3

Czerwinski won

Handicap · Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

W. Suchecki10