TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Berlin
WTT Feeder BerlinMatch #12466441
Played Aug 21Finished
Cezar Cozmolici
Home
4.00
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
2–2Last 4Won last 2
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
311511411––––
Nandan Naresh
Away
1.22
At publish
Lost last 4Form at publish
2–8Last 10Lost last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 17:24 and never touched — 62.5% is still 62.5%
Graded at full timeCezar Cozmolici to win
62.5%
62.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingCezar Cozmolici above · Nandan Naresh below
Set 1 · 3-11
Set 2 · 5-11
Set 3 · 4-11
Point 45 set 3, 4-11 — our read held Cezar Cozmolici at 62.5%
45 points played in total.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 17:24What took a side2 for · 2 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.22 (77%)
Naresh
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Cozmolici 50% vs Naresh 20%
Cozmolici
Wrong
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Cozmolici 50% vs Naresh 20%
Cozmolici
Wrong
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Cozmolici +2 · Naresh -4
Naresh
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 77% — Strong (leans Naresh) · live re-read · sealed at 38% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Naresh form (20%) is below what odds imply (82%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsCozmolici 4.00 / Naresh 1.22
Signal prob.23% / 77%
Edge (Naresh)+0.0pp
WTT Feeder Berlin · #12466441
Cozmolici4.00
50%won 2 of 4 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 2 of 4
Naresh1.22
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 4
oldest → newest22%takes the first set · 2 of 9
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricCozmoliciNareshBasisWin rate · lifetime3 / 5 vs 2 / 1060%20%3 / 5 vs 2 / 10Avg sets wonper match2.00.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
NareshCozmolici 4.00/Naresh 1.22
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
76.6%
Naresh · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Naresh won
Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
C. Cozmolici5
N. Naresh10
LAug 22 · 11:55N. Naresh6.50113971M. Badowski1.1081111113LJul 23 · 21:10D. Kozul1.051111113N. Naresh9.755340LJul 23 · 07:00D. Kozul1.051111113N. Naresh8.505340LJun 28 · 20:45N. Naresh10.50681141Y. Chen1.0211118113LMay 4 · 17:00N. Naresh8.503440S. Gauzy1.051111113WMay 1 · 10:10E. Andre—6560N. Naresh—1111113LApr 30 · 10:20N. Naresh1.530J. Chua2.383LApr 30 · 09:20N. Naresh1.708390I. Quek2.051111113LApr 15 · 16:50N. Naresh3.7510880D. Kozul1.251211113WApr 15 · 10:20N. Naresh1.30111314113M. Andersen3.405151271
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.