TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Berlin Quals
WTT Feeder Berlin QualsMatch #12459499
Played Aug 19Finished
Tom Closset
Home
1.50
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
9111147111011––
Cezar Cozmolici
Away
2.50
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
0–2Last 2Lost last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:22 and never touched — 50.0% is still 50.0%
Final score unavailable — not graded hereEven read — no favourite
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Pick
NoneHow it is goingTom Closset above · Cezar Cozmolici below
Set 1 · 9-11
Set 2 · 11-4
Set 3 · 7-11
Set 4 · 10-11
Point 74 set 4, 10-11 — our read held Tom Closset at 50.0%
74 points played in total.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 09:22What took a side3 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.50 (63%)
Closset
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Closset 40% vs Cozmolici 0%
Closset
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Closset 60% vs Cozmolici 0%
Closset
Wrong
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Closset +1 · Cozmolici -2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 63% — Clear lean (leans Closset) · live re-read · sealed at 50% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Cozmolici form (0%) is below what odds imply (40%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsClosset 1.50 / Cozmolici 2.50
Signal prob.63% / 38%
Edge (Closset)+0.0pp
WTT Feeder Berlin Quals · #12459499
Closset1.50
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
56%takes the first set · 5 of 9
Cozmolici2.50
0%won 0 of 2 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest0%takes the first set · 0 of 2
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricClossetCozmoliciBasisWin rate · lifetime6 / 10 vs 0 / 360%33.3%6 / 10 vs 0 / 3Avg sets wonper match2.21.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ClossetClosset 1.50/Cozmolici 2.50
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
62.5%
Closset · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Cozmolici won
Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
T. Closset10
LAug 26 · 10:20D. Lillo1.22811117113T. Closset4.0011851172LAug 21 · 16:50R. Kawakami1.051111113T. Closset8.507770WAug 20 · 15:05L. Stoll1.831211139102T. Closset1.831441111123WAug 20 · 09:10T. Closset2.631311113N. Tretiak1.4411960WMay 11 · 08:10T. Closset—11611113L. Ullmann—311891LMay 10 · 16:30T. Closset—4118101Z. Kenjaev—11711123LApr 18 · 14:30T. Closset—1181081A. Klajber—91112113LApr 14 · 16:55T. Closset—7760H. Suzuki—1111113WApr 14 · 11:00T. Closset—131111113S. Gilles—156841WApr 13 · 11:40T. Closset1.06121112113C. Hold7.001071451
C. Cozmolici5
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.