Daehwan Kim vs Yuta Tanaka 0-3 — WTT Feeder Vientiane

TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane

WTT Feeder VientianeMatch #12374188

Played Aug 7Finished

Daehwan Kim

Home

4.33

At publish

Won last 4

Form at publish

4–0Last 4Won last 4

Final

0 – 3

Set by set

711711511––––

Yuta Tanaka

Away

1.20

At publish

Won last 2

Form at publish

5–5Last 10Won last 2

The read, and what happenedsealed at 18:36 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%

Graded at full time

Daehwan Kim to win

54.0%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Wrong

no pick shipped

How it is goingDaehwan Kim above · Yuta Tanaka below

Set 1 · 7-11

Set 2 · 7-11

Set 3 · 5-11

Point 52 set 3, 5-11 — our read held Daehwan Kim at 54.0%

52 points played in total.

H2H Daehwan Kim 0–1 Yuta Tanaka Daehwan Kim has won 0 of their 1 meetings.

Last 1 · 0–1Same sideHead to head

The pickNo pick published

Sealed 18:36

What took a side3 for · 2 against · 1 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.20 (78%)

Tanaka

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

0-1 in 1

—

Too close

1 played, under the floor of 3

Rating (G2)

Kim 1858 vs Tanaka 2044

Tanaka

Correct

both rated, 185 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Kim 100% vs Tanaka 80%

Kim

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Kim 100% vs Tanaka 50%

Kim

Wrong

50pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Kim +4 · Tanaka +2

Kim

Wrong

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

3 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 78% — Strong (leans Tanaka) · live re-read · sealed at 46% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Kim form (100%) outperforms what odds imply (23%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsKim 4.33 / Tanaka 1.20

Signal prob.22% / 78%

Edge (Tanaka)-0.0pp

WTT Feeder Vientiane · #12374188

Kim4.33

100%won 4 of 4 · last 10

Won last 4

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 2 of 4

Tanaka1.20

50%won 5 of 10 · last 10

Won last 2

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

Head to head

H2H window

The recordacross 1 meeting

HomeKim0wins

AwayTanaka1wins

Tanaka leads 1–0.

First set to match win · in this matchup

Not enough first sets

Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.

Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one

Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate

How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed

3–0Straight, home0

3–1Four sets, home0

3–2Decider, home0

2–3Decider, away0

1–3Four sets, away0

0–3Straight, away1

This 1 meeting

MetricKimTanakaK − TBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set01−1of 1Avg pointsper match19.033.0−14.0per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3

Career, not this matchup

MetricKimTanakaBasisWin rate · lifetime4 / 5 vs 4 / 580%80%4 / 5 vs 4 / 5Avg sets wonper match2.42.8per matchAvg pointsper match38.236.0per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Tanaka

Kim 4.33/Tanaka 1.20

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

78.3%

Tanaka · sealed before the serve

What happened

0–3

Tanaka won

Event Chatroom

This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.