TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
Blazej Warpas vs Jakub Lamperski 3-0 · TT Elite Series
TT Elite Series
Played Oct 6Finished
Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 3
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
13111171210––––
Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 6
The read, and what happenedsealed at 07:17 and never touched: 64.3% is still 64.3%
Graded at full timeJakub Lamperski to win
64.3%
64.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
64 points played in total.
Set by set
13111171210––––
H2H Blazej Warpas 1–0 Jakub Lamperski Jakub Lamperski has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 07:1764.3%Our read64.5%to break even at 1.55
short by 0.2pp64.5% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.55 they are the same number)
What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.55 (59%)
Lamperski
Wrong
no bar to clear: a priced side always votes
H2H
1-0 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Warpas 1342 vs Lamperski 1488
Lamperski
Wrong
both rated, 145 points apart, no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Warpas 60% vs Lamperski 100%
Lamperski
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Warpas 50% vs Lamperski 70%
Lamperski
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Warpas +3 · Lamperski +6
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 64% · Clear lean (leans Lamperski) · sealed before the serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Lamperski form (100%) outperforms what odds imply (65%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsWarpas 2.25 / Lamperski 1.55
Signal prob.36% / 64%
Edge (Lamperski)-0.2pp
TT Elite Series · #13253018
Warpas2.25
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
Won last 3
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog40% won 92 of 228
Down 0–1, comes back14% 18 of 133
Down 0–2, comes back3% 2 of 78
Lamperski1.55
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
Won last 6
oldest → newest80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As favourite82% won 23 of 28
Up 2–0, closes it100% 14 of 14
Up 1–0, closes it95% 20 of 21
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeWarpas1wins
AwayLamperski0wins
Warpas leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n: a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it, below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it, below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it, below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home1
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away0
This 1 meeting
MetricWarpasLamperskiW − LBasisWins10+1in 1 meetingFirst set10+1of 1Avg pointsper match36.028.0+8.0per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricWarpasLamperskiBasisWin rate · lifetime438 / 850 vs 31 / 4851.5%64.6%438 / 850 vs 31 / 48Avg sets wonper match2.02.2per matchAvg pointsper match38.236.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did: no prediction
Match Winner
LamperskiWarpas 2.25/Lamperski 1.55
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
64.3%
Lamperski · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Warpas won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
WOct 6 · 07:20B. Warpas361311123J. Lamperski28117100
B. Warpas10
WOct 6 · 06:05M. Lukaszewski2.5511990B. Warpas1.451311113WOct 6 · 04:55M. Kukawka1.9561160B. Warpas1.751113113WOct 6 · 03:25D. Wrobel1.8591090B. Warpas1.851112113LOct 5 · 08:10B. Warpas1.6098110M. Lukaszewski2.151111133LOct 5 · 06:30B. Wisniewski2.0911811113B. Warpas1.67811891LOct 5 · 05:40M. Zwolinski1.9013101112113B. Warpas1.75111281452LOct 5 · 04:55B. Warpas4.006680M. Kolek1.221111113WOct 5 · 03:50B. Warpas3.231111113A. Sobel1.305680WOct 2 · 13:55B. Warpas1.8516711113J. Przewlocki1.851411941LOct 2 · 12:40B. Warpas3.40711971J. Zochniak1.2511811113
J. Lamperski10
WOct 6 · 05:15D. Wrobel3.0538111332J. Lamperski1.301111811113WOct 6 · 04:30M. Lukaszewski3.105550J. Lamperski1.321111113WOct 6 · 03:00A. Sobel—5611101J. Lamperski—11119123WOct 3 · 00:35J. Lamperski1.501111133D. Poloszczanski2.3578110WOct 2 · 23:45J. Glanowski1.901111541J. Lamperski1.8013511113WOct 2 · 22:35J. Lamperski1.45111211123M. Trela2.508142101LOct 2 · 21:55K. Sulkowski2.5211911113J. Lamperski1.47811471LOct 2 · 00:35K. Klocek2.2571111113J. Lamperski1.55116761LOct 1 · 22:55A. Myszewski1.85117118113J. Lamperski1.8061191182WOct 1 · 22:15J. Rolak2.656320J. Lamperski1.401111113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.