Jakub Lamperski vs Dariusz Wrobel 3-0

TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series

TT Elite Series

Played Oct 1Finished

Jakub Lamperski

Home

1.66

At publish

Lost last 1

Form at publish

7–3Last 10Lost last 1

Final

3 – 0

Set by set

114115115––––

Dariusz Wrobel

Away

2.05

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

6–4Last 10Won last 1

The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:40 and never touched: 62.2% is still 62.2%

Graded at full time

Jakub Lamperski to win

62.2%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct, not a call that won.

How it is going

Point-by-point unavailable

BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.

47 points played in total.

Set by set

114115115––––

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 15:40

62.2%Our read60.2%to break even at 1.66

clears by 2.0pp

60.2% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.66 they are the same number)

What took a side2 for · 1 against · 3 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.66 (55%)

Lamperski

Correct

no bar to clear: a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Lamperski 1446 vs Wrobel 1319

Lamperski

Correct

both rated, 127 points apart, no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Lamperski 40% vs Wrobel 60%

Wrobel

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Lamperski 70% vs Wrobel 60%

—

Too close

10pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Streak

Lamperski -1 · Wrobel +1

—

Too close

neither holds a run of 3 on their own

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

2 for, 3 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 62% · Clear lean (leans Lamperski) · sealed before the serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Wrobel form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (49%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsLamperski 1.66 / Wrobel 2.05

Signal prob.62% / 38%

Edge (Lamperski)+2.0pp

TT Elite Series · #13225639

Lamperski1.66

70%won 7 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

oldest → newest

70%takes the first set · 7 of 10

As favourite87% won 13 of 15

Up 2–0, closes it100% 8 of 8

Up 1–0, closes it100% 10 of 10

Wrobel2.05

60%won 6 of 10 · last 10

Last match: 5 days ago (Sep 26)

oldest → newest

40%takes the first set · 4 of 10

As underdog44% won 58 of 131

Down 0–1, comes back27% 21 of 77

Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 40

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands: it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricLamperskiWrobelBasisWin rate · lifetime18 / 31 vs 529 / 109858.1%48.2%18 / 31 vs 529 / 1098Avg sets wonper match2.01.9per matchAvg pointsper match36.037.7per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

Forecastthe model predicts this market

Match Winner

Lamperski

Lamperski 1.66/Wrobel 2.05

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

62.2%

Lamperski · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–0

Lamperski won

Handicap · Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together: one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

J. Lamperski10