TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite Series
Played Sep 20Finished
Wojciech Urban
Home
2.60
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 2
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
119711118611911
Piotr Zemla
Away
1.41
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
8–2Last 10Won last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:40 and never touched — 68.8% is still 68.8%
Graded at full timePiotr Zemla to win
68.8%
68.8%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
94 points played in total.
Set by set
119711118611911
H2H Wojciech Urban 1–1 Piotr Zemla Dead even across their 2 meetings.
Last 2 · 1–1Head to head
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 20:40What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.41 (65%)
Zemla
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-1 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Urban 1315 vs Zemla 1491
Zemla
Correct
both rated, 176 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Urban 40% vs Zemla 60%
Zemla
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Urban 30% vs Zemla 80%
Zemla
Correct
50pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Urban -2 · Zemla +3
Zemla
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 68% — Clear lean (leans Zemla) · live re-read · sealed at 69% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Zemla form (60%) is below what odds imply (71%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsUrban 2.60 / Zemla 1.41
Signal prob.32% / 68%
Edge (Zemla)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13161312
Urban2.60
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
Lost last 2
oldest → newest80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As underdog41% won 211 of 518
Down 0–1, comes back19% 54 of 284
Down 0–2, comes back7% 11 of 170
Zemla1.41
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
Won last 3
oldest → newest80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As favourite65% won 48 of 74
Up 2–0, closes it94% 31 of 33
Up 1–0, closes it77% 36 of 47
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeUrban1wins
AwayZemla1wins
2 of 2 to a deciderLevel at 1–1, and 2 of those 2 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home1
2–3Decider, away1
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricUrbanZemlaU − ZBasisWins110in 2 meetingsFirst set110of 2Avg pointsper match46.046.00.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricUrbanZemlaBasisWin rate · lifetime768 / 1631 vs 55 / 8847.1%62.5%768 / 1631 vs 55 / 88Avg sets wonper match1.92.4per matchAvg pointsper match38.038.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ZemlaUrban 2.60/Zemla 1.41
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
67.6%
Zemla · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Zemla won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LSep 20 · 06:00W. Urban4411711692P. Zemla50911811113
WAug 30 · 03:35W. Urban481111411113P. Zemla4213311962
W. Urban10
LSep 20 · 04:25W. Urban1.95119881K. Juszczyk1.7491111113LSep 20 · 03:10W. Urban1.908370M. Paszkiewicz1.801111113WSep 19 · 08:45W. Urban2.001111113W. Pytlas1.713750WSep 19 · 07:10W. Urban1.6812145113T. Lojtek2.0510121181LSep 19 · 06:00W. Urban1.30431181M. Cesarz3.1511113113LSep 19 · 04:25W. Urban1.83117991J. Pelka1.8381111113LSep 19 · 03:10W. Urban1.66158871J. Kaczmarek2.10131111113WSep 18 · 14:20W. Urban2.251111113S. Szostok1.574980LSep 18 · 12:40K. Hetnar1.44111211113W. Urban2.631310881LSep 18 · 11:50J. Pelka1.8351111113W. Urban1.83117741
P. Zemla10
WSep 20 · 05:10P. Zemla1.541111113W. Pytlas2.354490WSep 20 · 04:00P. Zemla1.4111128113M. Adamus2.604101131WSep 17 · 20:45G. Jurowicz3.203250P. Zemla1.271111113LSep 17 · 19:35P. Zemla1.79913111122M. Tkocz1.851111139113LSep 17 · 18:25M. Koczyba1.851111123P. Zemla1.7889100WSep 17 · 17:10W. Pytlas2.27311115102P. Zemla1.52114911123WSep 17 · 15:35W. Jozala4.25461371P. Zemla1.16111111113WSep 13 · 08:00T. Lojtek3.556770P. Zemla1.241111113WSep 13 · 07:10W. Pytlas2.173580P. Zemla1.571111113WSep 13 · 06:25P. Zemla1.141111113I. Szymanski4.507480
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.