TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13145053
Played Sep 17Finished
Wojciech Pytlas
Home
2.27
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Won last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
3111141195111012
Piotr Zemla
Away
1.52
At publish
Won last 5Form at publish
8–2Last 10Won last 5
The read, and what happenedsealed at 07:32 and never touched — 80.2% is still 80.2%
Graded at full timePiotr Zemla to win
80.2%
80.2%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
87 points played in total.
Set by set
3111141195111012
H2H Wojciech Pytlas 1–7 Piotr Zemla Wojciech Pytlas has won 1 of their 8 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 07:32What took a side6 for · 0 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.52 (60%)
Zemla
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-7 in 8
Zemla
Correct
gap of 6 in 8, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Pytlas 1308 vs Zemla 1479
Zemla
Correct
both rated, 170 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Pytlas 20% vs Zemla 100%
Zemla
Correct
80pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Pytlas 40% vs Zemla 80%
Zemla
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Pytlas +1 · Zemla +5
Zemla
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
6 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 64% — Clear lean (leans Zemla) · live re-read · sealed at 80% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Zemla form (100%) outperforms what odds imply (66%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsPytlas 2.27 / Zemla 1.52
Signal prob.36% / 64%
Edge (Zemla)+4.4pp
TT Elite Series · #13145053
Pytlas2.27
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog41% won 50 of 121
Down 0–1, comes back30% 24 of 80
Down 0–2, comes back14% 6 of 42
Zemla1.52
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
Won last 5
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite65% won 45 of 69
Up 2–0, closes it94% 29 of 31
Up 1–0, closes it75% 33 of 44
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 8 meetings
HomePytlas1wins
AwayZemla7wins
2 of 8 to a deciderZemla leads 7–1, and 2 of those 8 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomePytlasn = 0, below the 3 needed
AwayZemla87.5%7 of 8
Set by set, in these 8 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Pytlas0Zemla8n = 8Zemla took 8 of 8
S2Pytlas1Zemla7n = 8Zemla took 7 of 8
S3Pytlas3Zemla5n = 8Zemla took 5 of 8
S4Pytlas2Zemla2n = 4split evenly
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 8 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 8 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home113%
2–3Decider, away113%
1–3Four sets, away225%
0–3Straight, away450%
These 8 meetings
MetricPytlasZemlaP − ZBasisWins17−6in 8 meetingsFirst set08−8of 8Avg pointsper match30.039.2−9.2per matchSweeps04−43–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricPytlasZemlaBasisWin rate · lifetime396 / 755 vs 50 / 8152.5%61.7%396 / 755 vs 50 / 81Avg sets wonper match2.02.4per matchAvg pointsper match37.038.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ZemlaPytlas 2.27/Zemla 1.52
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
64.3%
Zemla · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Zemla won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record8
LSep 13 · 07:10W. Pytlas163580P. Zemla331111113
LSep 5 · 05:10W. Pytlas189450P. Zemla331111113
LSep 1 · 18:45W. Pytlas4998111382P. Zemla521111811113
LAug 30 · 08:00W. Pytlas177550P. Zemla331111113
WAug 19 · 17:10W. Pytlas491051111123P. Zemla44121192102
LAug 9 · 04:00W. Pytlas185850P. Zemla331111113
LJul 26 · 04:00W. Pytlas3511311101P. Zemla4213116123
LJul 22 · 15:10W. Pytlas381012881P. Zemla44121011113
W. Pytlas10
WSep 17 · 18:00G. Jurowicz2.50331681W. Pytlas1.43111114113WSep 17 · 16:00W. Pytlas2.2113115113M. Koczyba1.551181171LSep 13 · 08:45W. Pytlas1.306430I. Szymanski3.251111113LSep 13 · 07:10W. Pytlas2.173580P. Zemla1.571111113LSep 13 · 06:00W. Pytlas1.80931191M. Adamus1.8511119113LSep 13 · 04:25W. Pytlas1.557650T. Lojtek2.301111113LSep 13 · 03:10W. Pytlas1.858660K. Juszczyk1.801111113LSep 12 · 08:45W. Pytlas1.5811514111O. Sokolowski2.1471116133WSep 12 · 07:10W. Pytlas1.57111193113P. Mecik2.2598111172WSep 12 · 06:00W. Pytlas2.0591111113R. Skotniczny1.64115551
P. Zemla10
LSep 17 · 18:25M. Koczyba1.851111123P. Zemla1.7889100WSep 17 · 15:35W. Jozala4.25461371P. Zemla1.16111111113WSep 13 · 08:00T. Lojtek3.556770P. Zemla1.241111113WSep 13 · 07:10W. Pytlas2.173580P. Zemla1.571111113WSep 13 · 06:25P. Zemla1.141111113I. Szymanski4.507480WSep 13 · 04:50P. Zemla1.6181211123K. Juszczyk2.0911107101LSep 13 · 04:00M. Adamus2.55117711113P. Zemla1.4291111652WSep 10 · 20:45P. Brozek1.958790P. Zemla1.751111113WSep 10 · 19:35P. Zemla1.831211113M. Tkocz1.8310830LSep 10 · 18:25P. Gasiorski1.36129511113P. Zemla2.75101111772
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.