Kamil Kowalski vs Krzysztof Schaniel 1-3

TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series

TT Elite Series

Played Sep 29Finished

Kamil Kowalski

Home

3.25

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

2–8Last 10Won last 1

Final

1 – 3

Set by set

211711114511––

Krzysztof Schaniel

Away

1.33

At publish

Lost last 3

Form at publish

2–8Last 10Lost last 3

The read, and what happenedsealed at 04:52 and never touched: 73.7% is still 73.7%

Graded at full time

Krzysztof Schaniel to win

73.7%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct, not a call that won.

How it is goingKamil Kowalski above · Krzysztof Schaniel below

Set 1 · 2-11

Set 2 · 7-11

Set 3 · 11-4

Set 4 · 5-11

Point 62 set 4, 5-11 · our read held Krzysztof Schaniel at 73.7%

62 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 04:52

What took a side3 for · 0 against · 3 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.33 (71%)

Schaniel

Correct

no bar to clear: a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Kowalski 1095 vs Schaniel 1234

Schaniel

Correct

both rated, 139 points apart, no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Kowalski 20% vs Schaniel 20%

—

Too close

0pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Kowalski 20% vs Schaniel 20%

—

Too close

0pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Streak

Kowalski +1 · Schaniel -3

Schaniel

Correct

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

3 for, 3 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 74% · Strong (leans Schaniel) · sealed before the serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Schaniel form (20%) is below what odds imply (75%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsKowalski 3.25 / Schaniel 1.33

Signal prob.26% / 74%

Edge (Schaniel)+2.8pp

TT Elite Series · #13210168

Kowalski3.25

20%won 2 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As underdog18% won 25 of 143

Down 0–1, comes back6% 5 of 89

Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 61

Schaniel1.33

20%won 2 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

Lost last 3

oldest → newest

40%takes the first set · 4 of 10

As favourite57% won 186 of 326

Up 2–0, closes it89% 91 of 102

Up 1–0, closes it74% 140 of 189

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands: it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricKowalskiSchanielBasisWin rate · lifetime25 / 151 vs 855 / 172916.6%49.5%25 / 151 vs 855 / 1729Avg sets wonper match1.22.0per matchAvg pointsper match32.739.0per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did: no prediction

Match Winner

Schaniel

Kowalski 3.25/Schaniel 1.33

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

73.7%

Schaniel · sealed before the serve

What happened

1–3

Schaniel won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together: one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

K. Kowalski10