TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
Bartosz Czerwinski vs Bartlomiej Wisniewski 3-1 · TT Elite Series
TT Elite Series
Played Sep 25Finished
Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 2
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
117116411117––
Form at publish
4–6Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 04:15 and never touched — 59.7% is still 59.7%
Graded at full timeBartosz Czerwinski to win
59.7%
59.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
68 points played in total.
Set by set
117116411117––
H2H Bartosz Czerwinski 2–1 Bartlomiej Wisniewski Bartlomiej Wisniewski has won 1 of their 3 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 04:15What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.24 (73%)
Czerwinski
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
2-1 in 3
—
Too close
gap of 1, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Czerwinski 1541 vs Wisniewski 1276
Czerwinski
Correct
both rated, 266 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Czerwinski 60% vs Wisniewski 40%
Czerwinski
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Czerwinski 70% vs Wisniewski 40%
Czerwinski
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Czerwinski +2 · Wisniewski +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 75% — Strong (leans Czerwinski) · live re-read · sealed at 60% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Czerwinski form (60%) is below what odds imply (81%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsCzerwinski 1.24 / Wisniewski 3.28
Signal prob.75% / 25%
Edge (Czerwinski)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13192750
Czerwinski1.24
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
Won last 2
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite63% won 103 of 164
Up 2–0, closes it100% 42 of 42
Up 1–0, closes it85% 72 of 85
Wisniewski3.28
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog36% won 161 of 447
Down 0–1, comes back15% 40 of 264
Down 0–2, comes back1% 2 of 143
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 3 meetings
HomeCzerwinski2wins
AwayWisniewski1wins
1 of 3 to a deciderCzerwinski leads 2–1, and 1 of those 3 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 3 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Czerwinski2Wisniewski1n = 3Czerwinski took 2 of 3
S2Czerwinski1Wisniewski2n = 3Wisniewski took 2 of 3
S3Czerwinski1Wisniewski2n = 3Wisniewski took 2 of 3
S4Czerwinski2Wisniewski1n = 3Czerwinski took 2 of 3
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 3 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 3 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home133%
3–2Decider, home133%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away133%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 3 meetings
MetricCzerwinskiWisniewskiC − WBasisWins21+1in 3 meetingsFirst set21+1of 3Avg pointsper match40.737.0+3.7per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricCzerwinskiWisniewskiBasisWin rate · lifetime495 / 1032 vs 891 / 188248%47.3%495 / 1032 vs 891 / 1882Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match38.038.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
CzerwinskiCzerwinski 1.24/Wisniewski 3.28
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
75.4%
Czerwinski · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Czerwinski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record3
WSep 17 · 05:15B. Czerwinski46711611113B. Wisniewski4111811292
WSep 14 · 05:15B. Czerwinski4111811113B. Wisniewski33711691
LSep 7 · 07:40B. Czerwinski35119871B. Wisniewski3741111113
B. Czerwinski10
WSep 25 · 04:10R. Stapor2.5579110B. Czerwinski1.461111133WSep 25 · 03:25B. Czerwinski1.251111113D. Wrobel3.406880LSep 24 · 14:40B. Czerwinski1.5076111182F. Krcil2.40111178113WSep 24 · 13:05B. Czerwinski1.601111113A. Mugowski2.159890LSep 24 · 11:50B. Czerwinski1.57591191R. Stapor2.2011119113WSep 24 · 10:10B. Czerwinski1.57149411113W. Iwasyszyn2.26121111532LSep 24 · 09:00B. Czerwinski2.3066100K. Wisniewski1.551111123WSep 23 · 08:10B. Czerwinski1.4791111113M. Lukaszewski2.45116771WSep 23 · 06:30A. Szoltysek3.557570B. Czerwinski1.221111113WSep 23 · 05:40W. Iwasyszyn3.3085100B. Czerwinski1.271111123
B. Wisniewski10
WSep 25 · 04:30M. Zagajewski1.55691181B. Wisniewski2.2511115113LSep 25 · 03:00R. Stapor1.351114113B. Wisniewski2.9071250WSep 24 · 07:40B. Wisniewski2.351111113F. Krcil1.507760LSep 24 · 06:30B. Wisniewski2.40791113102M. Lukaszewski1.501111911123LSep 24 · 05:15B. Wisniewski3.10711981R. Stapor1.3311611113LSep 24 · 04:10W. Iwasyszyn1.75131111113B. Wisniewski1.951191391WSep 24 · 03:25B. Wisniewski2.10111195113A. Mugowski1.6554111162LSep 22 · 07:40B. Wisniewski1.77121040D. Wrobel1.951412113LSep 22 · 06:30B. Wisniewski3.15911751R. Stapor1.3011911113WSep 22 · 05:15B. Wisniewski2.001011115163M. Lukaszewski1.70127911142
Upcoming Matches
B. Czerwinski
B. Wisniewski
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.