Fanbo Meng vs Temirlan Jiyenbayev 3-1 — WTT Star Contender Astana Quals

TT Lossbeater/WTT Star Contender Astana Quals

WTT Star Contender Astana QualsMatch #13135016

Played Sep 15Finished

Fanbo Meng

Home

1.06

At publish

Lost last 1

Form at publish

3–7Last 10Lost last 1

Final

3 – 1

Set by set

116116911113––

Temirlan Jiyenbayev

Away

8.00

At publish

Lost last 1

Form at publish

1–1Last 2Lost last 1

The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:21 and never touched — 88.3% is still 88.3%

Graded at full time

Fanbo Meng to win

88.3%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is goingFanbo Meng above · Temirlan Jiyenbayev below

Set 1 · 11-6

Set 2 · 11-6

Set 3 · 9-11

Set 4 · 11-3

Point 68 set 4, 11-3 — our read held Fanbo Meng at 88.3%

68 points played in total.

H2H Fanbo Meng 1–0 Temirlan Jiyenbayev Temirlan Jiyenbayev has won 0 of their 1 meetings.

Last 1 · 1–0Same sideHead to head

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 12:21

What took a side1 for · 1 against · 3 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.06 (88%)

Meng

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

1-0 in 1

—

Too close

1 played, under the floor of 3

Form (L5)

Meng 60% vs Jiyenbayev 50%

—

Too close

10pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Meng 30% vs Jiyenbayev 50%

Jiyenbayev

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Meng -1 · Jiyenbayev -1

—

Too close

neither holds a run of 3 on their own

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

1 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 88% — Strong (leans Meng)

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Jiyenbayev form (50%) outperforms what odds imply (13%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsMeng 1.06 / Jiyenbayev 8.00

Signal prob.88% / 12%

Edge (Meng)+0.0pp

WTT Star Contender Astana Quals · #13135016

Meng1.06

30%won 3 of 10 · last 10

oldest → newest

30%takes the first set · 3 of 10

Jiyenbayev8.00

50%won 1 of 2 · last 10

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 1 of 2

Head to head

H2H window

The recordacross 1 meeting

HomeMeng1wins

AwayJiyenbayev0wins

Meng leads 1–0.

First set to match win · in this matchup

Not enough first sets

Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.

Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one

Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate

How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed

3–0Straight, home0

3–1Four sets, home1

3–2Decider, home0

2–3Decider, away0

1–3Four sets, away0

0–3Straight, away0

This 1 meeting

MetricMengJiyenbayevM − JBasisWins10+1in 1 meetingFirst set10+1of 1Avg pointsper match42.026.0+16.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3

Career, not this matchup

MetricMengJiyenbayevBasisWin rate · lifetime3 / 10 vs 1 / 230%50%3 / 10 vs 1 / 2Avg sets wonper match1.51.5per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Meng

Meng 1.06/Jiyenbayev 8.00

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

88.3%

Meng · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–1

Meng won

Event Chatroom

This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.

Decision Summary

Deep Dive by Market

Match Winner

Event Chatroom

Decision Summary

Deep Dive by Market

Match Winner

Event Chatroom

Today's matches are already sealed.