TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane
WTT Feeder VientianeMatch #12370971
Played Aug 6Finished
Johan Hagberg
Home
No price at publish
Form at publish
No recent matches
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
118711611711––
Gaon Kim
Away
No price at publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 13:02 and never touched — 50.0% is still 50.0%
Final score unavailable — not graded hereEven read — no favourite
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Pick
NoneHow it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
72 points played in total.
Set by set
118711611711––
H2H Johan Hagberg 0–1 Gaon Kim Johan Hagberg has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 13:02What took a side0 for · 0 against · 5 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
0-1 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Form (L5)
No form on record
—
No value
no recent record for both players
Form (L10)
No form on record
—
No value
no recent record for both players
Streak
Streak unavailable
—
No value
no streak data
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
0 for, 5 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 50% — Coin-flip (leans Hagberg)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
WTT Feeder Vientiane · #12370971
Hagberg
Schema not supported
—
Kim
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
67%takes the first set · 6 of 9
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeHagberg0wins
AwayKim1wins
Kim leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
This 1 meeting
MetricHagbergKimH − KBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set10+1of 1Avg pointsper match31.041.0−10.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHagbergKimBasisWin rate · lifetime0 / 0 vs 5 / 1050%50%0 / 0 vs 5 / 10Avg sets wonper match1.51.9per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HagbergRead onlywould have missed
What we said
50%
Hagberg · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Kim won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
LAug 6 · 12:25J. Hagberg—117671G. Kim—81111113
J. Hagberg
No matches in this window
G. Kim10
LAug 27 · 17:25L. Pistej1.83117911113G. Kim1.8391111522WAug 27 · 10:55G. Kim1.571011611113B. Fruchart2.2512711582WAug 26 · 18:00G. Kim1.614111114113A. Keshavarzi2.20111361252LAug 22 · 11:55R. Castro2.10111111143G. Kim1.671395121WAug 21 · 10:20M. Andersen4.00111111862G. Kim1.22134911113LAug 7 · 06:20J. Choi2.00511112113G. Kim1.73116111062LJul 27 · 08:20R. Kawakami1.611111113G. Kim2.204770WJul 26 · 14:00G. Kim—1111113M. Toliev—3760LJul 21 · 03:00I. Quek1.5311911113G. Kim2.38211851LMay 22 · 10:45G. Kim2.751110571T. Poret1.4071211113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.