TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane
WTT Feeder VientianeMatch #12370511
Played Aug 6Finished
Josh Shao Han Chua
Home
No price at publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
11131210911611––
Tomas Polansky
Away
No price at publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 11:16 and never touched — 61.7% is still 61.7%
Graded at full timeTomas Polansky to win
61.7%
61.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
83 points played in total.
Set by set
11131210911611––
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 11:16What took a side1 for · 0 against · 4 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Chua 20% vs Polansky 60%
Polansky
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Chua 40% vs Polansky 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Chua -1 · Polansky -2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 4 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 62% — Slight lean (leans Polansky)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
WTT Feeder Vientiane · #12370511
Chua
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
44%takes the first set · 4 of 9
Polansky
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest33%takes the first set · 3 of 9
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricChuaPolanskyBasisWin rate · lifetime4 / 10 vs 5 / 1040%50%4 / 10 vs 5 / 10Avg sets wonper match1.62.1per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
Forecastthe model predicts this market
Match Winner
PolanskyRead onlywould have hit
What we said
61.7%
Polansky · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Polansky won
Handicap · Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
J. Chua10
LAug 27 · 10:55J. Chua4.0088100A. Bhattacharjee1.221111123WAug 26 · 17:25J. Chua1.398141110113M. Sip2.70111261282LAug 21 · 08:00J. Chua5.5061190I. Quek1.131113113LJul 22 · 05:55J. Chua2.1068111172C. Hung1.67111157113WJul 21 · 04:45S. Lee—971111152J. Chua—111197173LJun 16 · 12:05M. Kwan1.57581111113J. Chua2.2511115852LJun 9 · 09:45J. Chua—9570S. Aida—1111113LMay 5 · 19:30J. Chua2.25810110G. Teodoro1.571112133WApr 30 · 10:20N. Naresh1.530J. Chua2.383LApr 30 · 09:00K. Jha1.081111113J. Chua7.007140
T. Polansky10
WSep 3 · 16:09T. Polansky1.401111112A. Junior2.7585110LAug 30 · 08:00L. Qiu3.0011113113T. Polansky1.36791151WAug 29 · 08:48T. Polansky1.4411119113D. Prokopcov2.63461171LAug 28 · 08:38T. Polansky1.2096111132J. Piccolin4.3311117963LAug 7 · 06:20H. Hsu1.4011138113T. Polansky2.757111161LMay 5 · 17:20T. Konecny1.831111113T. Polansky1.835890LMay 5 · 16:00D. Reitspies1.8311611113T. Polansky1.83711751WApr 29 · 16:31T. Polansky1.8311611113Y. Pryshchepa1.83911791WApr 22 · 17:00D. Reitspies1.7311129782T. Polansky2.009101111113WApr 22 · 16:32T. Konecny1.831110581T. Polansky1.8351211113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.