TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane
WTT Feeder VientianeMatch #12367121
Played Aug 6Finished
Ki Ho Li
Home
4.00
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
6–1Last 7Won last 3
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
9111191151614––
Benyamin Faraji
Away
1.22
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 18:56 and never touched — 72.3% is still 72.3%
Graded at full timeBenyamin Faraji to win
72.3%
72.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingKi Ho Li above · Benyamin Faraji below
Set 1 · 9-11
Set 2 · 11-9
Set 3 · 11-5
Set 4 · 16-14
Point 86 set 4, 16-14 — our read held Benyamin Faraji at 72.3%
86 points played in total.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 18:56What took a side1 for · 3 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.22 (77%)
Faraji
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Li 80% vs Faraji 40%
Li
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Li 86% vs Faraji 40%
Li
Correct
46pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Li +3 · Faraji -2
Li
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 77% — Strong (leans Faraji) · live re-read · sealed at 72% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Faraji form (40%) is below what odds imply (82%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsLi 4.00 / Faraji 1.22
Signal prob.23% / 77%
Edge (Faraji)+0.0pp
WTT Feeder Vientiane · #12367121
Li4.00
86%won 6 of 7 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest86%takes the first set · 6 of 7
Faraji1.22
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricLiFarajiBasisWin rate · lifetime6 / 7 vs 4 / 1085.7%40%6 / 7 vs 4 / 10Avg sets wonper match2.71.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
FarajiLi 4.00/Faraji 1.22
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
76.6%
Faraji · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Li won
Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
K. Li8
LAug 7 · 06:20K. Li4.506650R. Yoshiyama1.171111113WAug 5 · 11:20K. Li—11118113N. Tan—771191WAug 5 · 05:05K. Li—11911113A. Gupta—711371WAug 4 · 10:05K. Li—11115123W. Yatawanon—8711101LJul 21 · 04:35Y. Sakai—11113123K. Li—9911101WJul 20 · 08:30K. Li—1111113T. Buyan—4480WJul 20 · 03:35K. Li—1111113R. Ramanathan—4130WJul 19 · 08:30K. Li—11117113W. Wong—561111
B. Faraji10
LFeb 19 · 05:20B. Faraji1.83111171172A. Pal1.83813116113LSep 19 · 09:25H. Suzuki1.83111110113B. Faraji1.83981281WSep 18 · 15:35A. Kenzhigulov2.0051271172B. Faraji1.731110118113LSep 5 · 06:35B. Faraji2.50381361F. Coton1.50111111113WSep 4 · 07:10B. Faraji1.8381113103J. Seyfried1.831151191LAug 30 · 10:50N. Alamiyan1.831111113B. Faraji1.838690WAug 29 · 17:50D. Levajac2.10771181B. Faraji1.6711118113WAug 29 · 12:05P. Sirucek1.836131191B. Faraji1.8311154113LAug 14 · 17:55D. Cho1.281311103B. Faraji3.5011290LMay 20 · 09:30W. Jang1.14111111154B. Faraji5.00487130
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.