TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane
WTT Feeder VientianeMatch #12361980
Played Aug 5Finished
Ki Ho Li
Home
No price at publish
Won last 1Form at publish
4–1Last 5Won last 1
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
117911113117––
Arjav Gupta
Away
No price at publish
Won last 1Form at publish
1–4Last 5Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 18:08 and never touched — 65.0% is still 65.0%
Graded at full timeKi Ho Li to win
65.0%
65.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
70 points played in total.
Set by set
117911113117––
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 18:08What took a side2 for · 0 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Li 80% vs Gupta 20%
Li
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Li 80% vs Gupta 20%
Li
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Li +1 · Gupta +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 65% — Clear lean (leans Li)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
WTT Feeder Vientiane · #12361980
Li
80%won 4 of 5 · last 10
oldest → newest
80%takes the first set · 4 of 5
Gupta
20%won 1 of 5 · last 10
oldest → newest
20%takes the first set · 1 of 5
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricLiGuptaBasisWin rate · lifetime4 / 5 vs 1 / 580%20%4 / 5 vs 1 / 5Avg sets wonper match2.61.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
Forecastthe model predicts this market
Match Winner
LiRead onlywould have hit
What we said
65%
Li · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Li won
Handicap · Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
K. Li8
LAug 7 · 06:20K. Li4.506650R. Yoshiyama1.171111113WAug 6 · 12:25K. Li4.0091111163B. Faraji1.221195141WAug 5 · 11:20K. Li—11118113N. Tan—771191WAug 4 · 10:05K. Li—11115123W. Yatawanon—8711101LJul 21 · 04:35Y. Sakai—11113123K. Li—9911101WJul 20 · 08:30K. Li—1111113T. Buyan—4480WJul 20 · 03:35K. Li—1111113R. Ramanathan—4130WJul 19 · 08:30K. Li—11117113W. Wong—561111
A. Gupta5
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.