TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane Women
WTT Feeder Vientiane WomenMatch #12360283
Played Aug 4Finished
Ming Shum Mak
Home
No price at publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
0–1Last 1Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
311911115911––
Hayeong Kim
Away
No price at publish
Won last 1Form at publish
1–0Last 1Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 11:25 and never touched — 50.0% is still 50.0%
Final score unavailable — not graded hereEven read — no favourite
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Pick
NoneHow it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
70 points played in total.
Set by set
311911115911––
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 11:25What took a side0 for · 2 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Mak 0% vs Kim 100%
Kim
Correct
100pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Mak 0% vs Kim 100%
Kim
Correct
100pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Mak -1 · Kim +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
0 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 50% — Coin-flip (leans Mak)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
WTT Feeder Vientiane Women · #12360283
Mak
0%won 0 of 1 · last 10
oldest → newest
0%takes the first set · 0 of 1
Kim
100%won 1 of 1 · last 10
oldest → newest
100%takes the first set · 1 of 1
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricMakKimBasisWin rate · lifetime0 / 3 vs 7 / 100%70%0 / 3 vs 7 / 10Avg sets wonper match0.72.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
Forecastthe model predicts this market
Match Winner
MakRead onlywould have missed
What we said
50%
Mak · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Kim won
Handicap · Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
M. Mak4
H. Kim10
LAug 6 · 11:15H. Kim2.50111171272S. Yoo1.50461114113WAug 4 · 04:40C. Huang—9111241H. Kim—11814113LApr 11 · 10:35H. Kim—1Y. Ghorpade—3WApr 10 · 15:30A. Dragoman—2H. Kim—3WApr 10 · 10:45F. Schreiner—1H. Kim—3WApr 9 · 15:35C. Carey—2H. Kim—3WApr 9 · 09:40M. Farei—0H. Kim—3LApr 5 · 09:25H. Kim—1H. Yang—3WApr 4 · 12:05Y. Huang—1H. Kim—3LMar 30 · 18:00H. Kim—1X. Ni—3
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.