TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane Women
WTT Feeder Vientiane WomenMatch #12359201
Played Aug 4Finished
Ching-Chia Huang
Home
No price at publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
1–2Last 3Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
9111181214411––
Hayeong Kim
Away
No price at publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 05:16 and never touched — 60.9% is still 60.9%
Graded at full timeHayeong Kim to win
60.9%
60.9%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
80 points played in total.
Set by set
9111181214411––
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 05:16What took a side2 for · 0 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Huang 33% vs Kim 80%
Kim
Correct
47pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Huang 33% vs Kim 70%
Kim
Correct
37pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Huang -1 · Kim -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 61% — Slight lean (leans Kim)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
WTT Feeder Vientiane Women · #12359201
Huang
33%won 1 of 3 · last 10
oldest → newest
33%takes the first set · 1 of 3
Kim
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricHuangKimBasisWin rate · lifetime0 / 3 vs 7 / 1033.3%70%0 / 3 vs 7 / 10Avg sets wonper match1.72.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
Forecastthe model predicts this market
Match Winner
KimRead onlywould have hit
What we said
60.9%
Kim · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Kim won
Handicap · Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
C. Huang6
H. Kim10
LAug 6 · 11:15H. Kim2.50111171272S. Yoo1.50461114113WAug 4 · 11:15M. Mak—391191H. Kim—11115113LApr 11 · 10:35H. Kim—1Y. Ghorpade—3WApr 10 · 15:30A. Dragoman—2H. Kim—3WApr 10 · 10:45F. Schreiner—1H. Kim—3WApr 9 · 15:35C. Carey—2H. Kim—3WApr 9 · 09:40M. Farei—0H. Kim—3LApr 5 · 09:25H. Kim—1H. Yang—3WApr 4 · 12:05Y. Huang—1H. Kim—3LMar 30 · 18:00H. Kim—1X. Ni—3
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.