TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Bangkok
WTT Feeder BangkokMatch #13135965
Played Sep 16Finished
Hojun Choi
Home
3.00
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 4
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
119119311117––
Kwan Kit Ho
Away
1.36
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 16:58 and never touched — 64.5% is still 64.5%
Graded at full timeKwan Kit Ho to win
64.5%
64.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingHojun Choi above · Kwan Kit Ho below
Set 1 · 11-9
Set 2 · 11-9
Set 3 · 3-11
Set 4 · 11-7
Point 72 set 4, 11-7 — our read held Kwan Kit Ho at 64.5%
72 points played in total.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 16:58What took a side1 for · 2 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.36 (69%)
Ho
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Choi 80% vs Ho 40%
Choi
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Choi 50% vs Ho 50%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Choi +4 · Ho +1
Choi
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 69% — Clear lean (leans Ho) · live re-read · sealed at 65% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Ho form (40%) is below what odds imply (73%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsChoi 3.00 / Ho 1.36
Signal prob.31% / 69%
Edge (Ho)+0.0pp
WTT Feeder Bangkok · #13135965
Choi3.00
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Ho1.36
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricChoiHoBasisWin rate · lifetime5 / 10 vs 5 / 1050%50%5 / 10 vs 5 / 10Avg sets wonper match1.81.9per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HoChoi 3.00/Ho 1.36
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
68.8%
Ho · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Choi won
Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
H. Choi10
LSep 17 · 05:55H. Choi3.4011111392H. Suzuki1.30941111113WSep 15 · 12:25H. Choi—91111113J. Wang—116591WSep 15 · 07:10H. Dogra—5230H. Choi—1111113WSep 14 · 11:20H. Choi—1111113R. Roy—3490WSep 14 · 05:50H. Choi—1111113A. Myat—6360LSep 10 · 02:00J. Nayre2.00111612113H. Choi1.738141461WApr 18 · 15:50H. Choi—11811113S. Sanchez—911941LApr 18 · 09:45H. Choi—118119122D. Back—311911143LApr 14 · 09:50S. Arpas—1112113H. Choi—61080LApr 13 · 10:30H. Choi2.457790D. Terna1.471111113
K. Ho10
WAug 5 · 05:25K. Ho—1011511113M. Habibi—12711782LAug 4 · 10:10K. Ho—841161J. Seo—11117113LJun 16 · 17:20K. Ho2.5012211992A. Gacina1.501011911113WJun 16 · 12:40Z. Chew2.3861312992K. Ho1.5311111011113LJun 10 · 09:10K. Ho3.797690L. Yuan1.181111113WJun 9 · 14:10F. Xue1.2011811682K. Ho4.33411611113WJun 9 · 08:25K. Ho—119811113H. Kwon—81111652LApr 9 · 05:25Y. Tanaka1.201111113K. Ho4.335160LApr 8 · 05:20Y. Pang1.9111118113K. Ho1.80591181WApr 7 · 03:35K. Ho1.2011117113H. Li4.33761131
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.