TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Olomouc
WTT Feeder OlomoucMatch #13001832
Played Aug 25Finished
Tzu-Yu Tseng
Home
1.22
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
911611711––––
Johan Havsteen
Away
4.00
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
2–3Last 5Lost last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 11:27 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeJohan Havsteen to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingTzu-Yu Tseng above · Johan Havsteen below
Set 1 · 9-11
Set 2 · 6-11
Set 3 · 7-10
Point 54 set 3, 7-10 — our read held Johan Havsteen at 54.0%
54 points drawn · the score is 1 ahead; the rest land in a moment.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 11:27What took a side0 for · 3 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.22 (77%)
Tseng
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Tseng 60% vs Havsteen 40%
Tseng
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Tseng 60% vs Havsteen 40%
Tseng
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Tseng +1 · Havsteen -2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
0 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 77% — Strong (leans Tseng) · live re-read · sealed at 46% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Havsteen form (40%) outperforms what odds imply (25%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsTseng 1.22 / Havsteen 4.00
Signal prob.77% / 23%
Edge (Tseng)+0.0pp
WTT Feeder Olomouc · #13001832
Tseng1.22
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
Havsteen4.00
40%won 2 of 5 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest25%takes the first set · 1 of 4
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricTsengHavsteenBasisWin rate · lifetime6 / 10 vs 1 / 460%25%6 / 10 vs 1 / 4Avg sets wonper match1.91.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
TsengTseng 1.22/Havsteen 4.00
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
76.6%
Tseng · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Havsteen won
Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
T. Tseng10
WAug 24 · 15:45T. Tseng1.201111113D. Kostal4.339770LAug 20 · 14:30W. Koehl1.671111113T. Tseng2.106780WAug 20 · 08:35A. Kenzhigulov2.00111011572T. Tseng1.73812211113WJul 20 · 04:55T. Tseng—1418116123Z. Tan—1616611102LJul 19 · 08:30T. Tseng—8790H. Yang—1111113LMar 14 · 11:20T. Tseng3.0031311111H. Deschamps1.3611157133WMar 13 · 09:35J. Kaucky1.521111441T. Tseng2.3571311113WMar 12 · 16:05T. Tseng—11511123G. Marjanovic—6114101WMar 12 · 10:00T. Tseng1.151111113C. Kramer4.555770LMar 4 · 12:30T. Tseng—10740M. Zalewski—1211113
J. Havsteen5
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.