TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane Women
WTT Feeder Vientiane WomenMatch #12377116
Played Aug 7Finished
Siwoo Yoo
Home
2.75
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
911411311––––
Seongjin Kim
Away
1.40
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 10:09 and never touched — 66.3% is still 66.3%
Graded at full timeSeongjin Kim to win
66.3%
66.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingSiwoo Yoo above · Seongjin Kim below
Set 1 · 9-11
Set 2 · 4-11
Set 3 · 3-11
Point 49 set 3, 3-11 — our read held Seongjin Kim at 66.3%
49 points played in total.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 10:09What took a side3 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.40 (66%)
Kim
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Yoo 60% vs Kim 80%
Kim
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Yoo 50% vs Kim 70%
Kim
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Yoo +2 · Kim +2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 66% — Clear lean (leans Kim)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Yoo form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (36%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsYoo 2.75 / Kim 1.40
Signal prob.34% / 66%
Edge (Kim)+0.0pp
WTT Feeder Vientiane Women · #12377116
Yoo2.75
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
Kim1.40
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricYooKimBasisWin rate · lifetime5 / 10 vs 7 / 1050%70%5 / 10 vs 7 / 10Avg sets wonper match1.72.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
Forecastthe model predicts this market
Match Winner
KimYoo 2.75/Kim 1.40
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
66.3%
Kim · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Kim won
Handicap · Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
S. Yoo10
WAug 7 · 05:10S. Chen1.83991171S. Yoo1.8311115113WAug 6 · 11:15H. Kim2.50111171272S. Yoo1.50461114113LJun 17 · 15:25Y. Yang—1111113S. Yoo—5350LJun 16 · 17:00Y. Yang1.281111113S. Yoo3.505350WJun 16 · 10:55L. Opeka8.507980S. Yoo1.051111113LJun 10 · 15:40S. Yoo2.708640F. Han1.351111113WJun 10 · 08:35Y. Tsai2.10671161S. Yoo1.6711117113WJun 9 · 15:55S. Yoo2.0021111113H. Ryu1.73117931LJun 5 · 15:30S. Odo—11117113S. Yoo—371121LJun 5 · 06:00S. Odo1.1311117113S. Yoo5.50371121
S. Kim10
LAug 8 · 03:00D. Lee1.8011811133S. Kim1.916119111WAug 7 · 05:10S. Men5.50611631S. Kim1.1311811113WAug 6 · 11:15W. Aueawiriyayothin6.50115351S. Kim1.1061111113LJul 22 · 10:50S. Kim2.00311881Y. Ojio1.7311411113WJul 22 · 04:45S. Kim1.051111113H. Patel8.502430WJul 21 · 03:30S. Kim—1111113D. Garmaeva—7250LApr 22 · 08:35Y. Yoo1.8311912113S. Kim1.836111091WApr 21 · 16:15S. Kim3.25411117113S. Aoki1.3311791192WApr 21 · 09:45S. Kim1.201111113L. Tsimashkova4.334870WApr 20 · 16:15S. Kim1.3011911143S. Lee3.407113121
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.