TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Vientiane Women
WTT Feeder Vientiane WomenMatch #12365788
Played Aug 6Finished
Shuohan Men
Home
4.00
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 2
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
117711118711119
Tsz Lam Kong
Away
1.22
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
2–8Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:46 and never touched — 76.6% is still 76.6%
Graded at full timeTsz Lam Kong to win
76.6%
76.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingShuohan Men above · Tsz Lam Kong below
Set 1 · 11-7
Set 2 · 7-11
Set 3 · 11-8
Set 4 · 7-11
Set 5 · 11-9
Point 93 set 5, 11-9 — our read held Tsz Lam Kong at 76.6%
93 points played in total.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 12:46What took a side1 for · 2 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.22 (77%)
Kong
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Men 40% vs Kong 20%
Men
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Men 40% vs Kong 20%
Men
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Men -2 · Kong -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 77% — Strong (leans Kong)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Kong form (20%) is below what odds imply (82%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsMen 4.00 / Kong 1.22
Signal prob.23% / 77%
Edge (Kong)+0.0pp
WTT Feeder Vientiane Women · #12365788
Men4.00
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Kong1.22
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricMenKongBasisWin rate · lifetime4 / 10 vs 2 / 1040%20%4 / 10 vs 2 / 10Avg sets wonper match1.41.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
KongMen 4.00/Kong 1.22
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
76.6%
Kong · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Men won
Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
S. Men10
LAug 7 · 05:10S. Men5.50611631S. Kim1.1311811113LJul 21 · 03:00S. Men3.75941191Z. Lee1.2511119113LJul 3 · 08:10S. Men2.255670N. Mani1.571111113WApr 30 · 09:40M. Aceves2.633850S. Men1.441111113WApr 29 · 09:50C. Kuan—9730S. Men—1111113LApr 9 · 04:15S. Men11.003450S. Yokoi1.021111113WApr 8 · 04:45S. Men1.671111123Z. Deng2.1097100LApr 7 · 08:35S. Men2.63118491E. Kim1.4471111113WMar 4 · 10:10K. Itagaki1.831174101S. Men1.8351111123LDec 1 · 09:00I. Cok1.361111113S. Men3.009680
T. Kong10
LJul 27 · 07:45T. Kong3.75581181V. Voronina1.2511118113WJul 26 · 06:00T. Kong—1111113D. Amonova—6640LJul 21 · 03:00Y. Yeh1.1051111113T. Kong6.50118561LJun 9 · 13:00X. Shan1.171111113T. Kong4.502570LJun 1 · 17:55M. Takeya1.3011811113T. Kong3.40711781LJun 1 · 11:20X. Ni1.221111113T. Kong4.008760WApr 30 · 10:10O. Leong4.2071211932T. Kong1.181110811113LApr 8 · 05:55K. Lyne1.8351412113T. Kong1.8311121091LApr 7 · 10:25T. Kong—541181X. Wang—11116113LApr 7 · 05:35T. Kong—51111962Y. Feng—117811113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.