TT Lossbeater/WTT Feeder Ulaanbaatar Women
WTT Feeder Ulaanbaatar WomenMatch #12270620
Played Jul 21Finished
Rin Mende
Home
1.13
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
5119111416––––
Hoi Tung Wong
Away
5.50
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:06 and never touched — 83.0% is still 83.0%
Graded at full timeRin Mende to win
83.0%
83.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingRin Mende above · Hoi Tung Wong below
Set 1 · 5-11
Set 2 · 9-11
Set 3 · 14-16
Point 66 set 3, 14-16 — our read held Rin Mende at 83.0%
66 points played in total.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 15:06What took a side3 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.13 (83%)
Mende
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
No meetings
—
No value
they have never met
Form (L5)
Mende 80% vs Wong 20%
Mende
Wrong
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Mende 70% vs Wong 40%
Mende
Wrong
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Mende +1 · Wong -2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 83% — Strong (leans Mende)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsMende 1.13 / Wong 5.50
Signal prob.83% / 17%
Edge (Mende)-0.0pp
WTT Feeder Ulaanbaatar Women · #12270620
Mende1.13
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
Wong5.50
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
First meeting
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.
Career, not this matchup
MetricMendeWongBasisWin rate · lifetime7 / 10 vs 4 / 1070%40%7 / 10 vs 4 / 10Avg sets wonper match2.61.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
MendeMende 1.13/Wong 5.50
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
83%
Mende · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Wong won
Total sets · Score
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Recent Results
R. Mende10
WAug 28 · 15:40R. Mende1.831113123M. Takeya1.83811100WAug 28 · 08:00M. Loy3.7510511111R. Mende1.2512119133WAug 27 · 16:15S. Sawettabut2.63911111382R. Mende1.44117915113WAug 27 · 09:45R. Mende1.101411123K. Wegrzyn6.50129100WAug 26 · 15:40R. Mende1.051111113S. Klee6.307470LAug 23 · 08:35N. Mittelham1.50981111133R. Mende2.30111178112WAug 22 · 16:15R. Mende2.501111113Y. Ojio1.507850WAug 22 · 10:10M. Loy3.40711681R. Mende1.3011911113WAug 21 · 08:00L. Morsch5.009440R. Mende1.141111113LJul 27 · 12:40R. Mende1.66821161Y. Ojio2.1011112113
H. Wong10
LAug 7 · 05:45D. Lee1.671114113H. Wong2.1051220WAug 6 · 10:40A. Nebuchadnezzar4.00761191H. Wong1.2211119113LJul 27 · 07:45M. Taylakova1.36611811113H. Wong3.0011811382WJul 26 · 13:15H. Wong2.3861111113D. Lee1.53118971LJul 22 · 04:45H. Wong2.5011116972T. Chien1.50881111113LJun 9 · 14:45H. Wong2.759119101W. Ng1.4011811123LJun 1 · 16:45S. Shibata1.171111113H. Wong4.506780WJun 1 · 09:00S. Tokic4.5011791142H. Wong1.17911119113LApr 8 · 05:20H. Wong1.7351141572H. Lee2.001171113113LApr 7 · 09:10H. Wong—129791Z. Liu—101111113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.